{"id":130778,"date":"2012-05-04T10:03:55","date_gmt":"2012-05-04T14:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/?p=130778"},"modified":"2012-12-26T16:04:14","modified_gmt":"2012-12-26T21:04:14","slug":"supreme-court-strip-searches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court’s Strange Ruling On Strip Searches"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Article:<\/strong> US Justices approve strip searches for any offense<\/a> by Adam Liptak in The New York Times.<\/p>\n

The Text:<\/strong> The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails even if the officials have no reason to suspect the presence of contraband.<\/p>\n

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, joined by the court\u2019s conservative wing, wrote that courts are in no position to second-guess the judgments of correctional officials who must consider not only the possibility of smuggled weapons and drugs, but also public health and information about gang affiliations.<\/p>\n

\u201cEvery detainee who will be admitted to the general population may be required to undergo a close visual inspection while undressed,\u201d Justice Kennedy wrote, adding that about 13 million people are admitted each year to the nation\u2019s jails.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The procedures endorsed by the majority are forbidden by statute in at least 10 states and are at odds with the policies of federal authorities. According to a supporting brief filed by the American Bar Association, international human rights treaties also ban the procedures.<\/p>\n

The federal appeals courts had been split on the question, though most of them prohibited strip searches unless they were based on a reasonable suspicion that contraband was present. The Supreme Court did not say that strip searches of every new arrestee were required; it ruled, rather, that the Fourth Amendment\u2019s prohibition of unreasonable searches did not forbid them.<\/p>\n

Daron Hall, the president of the American Correctional Association and sheriff of Davidson County, Tenn., said the association welcomed the flexibility offered by the decision. The association\u2019s current standards discourage blanket strip search policies.<\/p>\n

Monday\u2019s sharply divided decision came from a court whose ideological differences are under intense scrutiny after last week\u2019s arguments on President Obama\u2019s health care law. The ruling came less than two weeks after a pair of major 5-to-4 decisions on the right to counsel in plea negotiations, though there Justice Kennedy had joined the court\u2019s liberal wing. The majority and dissenting opinions on Monday agreed that the search procedures the decision allowed \u2014 close visual inspection by a guard while naked \u2014 were more intrusive than being observed while showering, but did not involve bodily contact.<\/p>\n

Justice Stephen G. Breyer, writing for the four dissenters, said the strip searches the majority allowed were \u201ca serious affront to human dignity and to individual privacy\u201d and should be used only when there was good reason to do so.<\/p>\n

Justice Breyer said that the Fourth Amendment should be understood to bar strip searches of people arrested for minor offenses not involving drugs or violence, unless officials had a reasonable suspicion that they were carrying contraband.<\/p>\n

Monday\u2019s decision endorsed a recent trend, from appeals courts in Atlanta, San Francisco and Philadelphia, allowing strip searches of everyone admitted to a jail\u2019s general population. At least seven other appeals courts, on the other hand, had ruled that such searches were proper only if there was a reasonable suspicion that the arrested person had contraband.<\/p>\n

According to opinions in the lower courts, people may be strip-searched after arrests for violating a leash law, driving without a license and failing to pay child support. Citing examples from briefs submitted to the Supreme Court, Justice Breyer wrote that people have been subjected to \u201cthe humiliation of a visual strip search\u201d after being arrested for driving with a noisy muffler, failing to use a turn signal and riding a bicycle without an audible bell.<\/p>\n

A nun was strip-searched, he wrote, after an arrest for trespassing during an antiwar demonstration.<\/p>\n

Justice Kennedy responded that \u201cpeople detained for minor offenses can turn out to be the most devious and dangerous criminals.\u201d He noted that Timothy McVeigh, later put to death for his role in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, was first arrested for driving without a license plate. \u201cOne of the terrorists involved in the Sept. 11 attacks was stopped and ticketed for speeding just two days before hijacking Flight 93,\u201d Justice Kennedy added.<\/p>\n

The case decided Monday, Florence v. County of Burlington, No. 10-945, arose from the arrest of Albert W. Florence in New Jersey in 2005. Mr. Florence was in the passenger seat of his BMW when a state trooper pulled his wife, April, over for speeding. A records search revealed an outstanding warrant for Mr. Florence\u2019s arrest based on an unpaid fine. (The information was wrong; the fine had been paid.)<\/p>\n

Mr. Florence was held for a week in jails in Burlington and Essex Counties, and he was strip-searched in each. There is some dispute about the details, but general agreement that he was made to stand naked in front of a guard who required him to move intimate parts of his body. The guards did not touch him.<\/p>\n

\u201cTurn around,\u201d Mr. Florence, in an interview last year, recalled being told by jail officials. \u201cSquat and cough. Spread your cheeks.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cI consider myself a man\u2019s man,\u201d said Mr. Florence, a finance executive for a car dealership. \u201cSix-three. Big guy. It was humiliating. It made me feel less than a man.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Kennedy said the most relevant precedent was Bell v. Wolfish, which was decided by a 5-to-4 vote in 1979. It allowed strip-searches of people held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York after \u201ccontact visits\u201d with outsiders.<\/p>\n

As in the Bell case, Justice Kennedy wrote, the \u201cundoubted security imperatives involved in jail supervision override the assertion that some detainees must be exempt from the more invasive search procedures at issue absent reasonable suspicion of a concealed weapon or other contraband.\u201d<\/p>\n

The majority and dissenting opinions drew differing conclusions from the available information about the amount of contraband introduced into jails and how much strip searches add to pat-downs and metal detectors.<\/p>\n

Justice Kennedy said one person arrested for disorderly conduct in Washington State \u201cmanaged to hide a lighter, tobacco, tattoo needles and other prohibited items in his rectal cavity.\u201d Officials in San Francisco, he added, \u201chave discovered contraband hidden in body cavities of people arrested for trespassing, public nuisance and shoplifting.\u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Breyer wrote that there was very little empirical support for the idea that strip searches detect contraband that would not have been found had jail officials used less intrusive means, particularly if strip searches were allowed when officials had a reasonable suspicion that they would find something.<\/p>\n

For instance, in a study of 23,000 people admitted to a correctional facility in Orange County, N.Y., using that standard, there was at most one instance of contraband detected that would not otherwise have been found, Judge Breyer wrote.<\/p>\n

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined Justice Breyer\u2019s dissent.<\/p>\n

Justice Kennedy said that strict policies deter people entering jails from even trying to smuggle contraband.<\/p>\n

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined all of Justice Kennedy\u2019s majority opinion, and Justice Clarence Thomas joined most of it.<\/p>\n

In a concurrence, Chief Justice Roberts, quoting from an earlier decision, said that exceptions to Monday\u2019s ruling were still possible \u201cto ensure that we \u2018not embarrass the future.\u2019 \u201d<\/p>\n

Justice Alito wrote that different rules might apply for people arrested but not held with the general population or whose detentions had \u201cnot been reviewed by a judicial officer.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Article: US Justices approve strip searches for any offense by Adam Liptak in The New York Times. The Text: The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails even if the officials have no reason to suspect […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[259],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Prose Before Hos\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-05-04T14:03:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-12-26T21:04:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Article of the Day\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@pbhnetwork\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@pbhnetwork\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Article of the Day\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/\",\"name\":\"The Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-05-04T14:03:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-12-26T21:04:14+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e19d7cf2b1a9aea1805fd7b4b4b2b4e\"},\"description\":\"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Supreme Court’s Strange Ruling On Strip Searches\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/\",\"name\":\"Prose Before Hos\",\"description\":\"The Far Side Of Politics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e19d7cf2b1a9aea1805fd7b4b4b2b4e\",\"name\":\"Article of the Day\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/pbhnetwork\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/author\/article-of-the-day\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches","description":"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches","og_description":"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/","og_site_name":"Prose Before Hos","article_published_time":"2012-05-04T14:03:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-12-26T21:04:14+00:00","author":"Article of the Day","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@pbhnetwork","twitter_site":"@pbhnetwork","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Article of the Day","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/","url":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/","name":"The Supreme Court's Strange Ruling On Strip Searches","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-05-04T14:03:55+00:00","dateModified":"2012-12-26T21:04:14+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e19d7cf2b1a9aea1805fd7b4b4b2b4e"},"description":"Thanks to the Supreme Court, officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/article-of-the-day\/05\/04\/supreme-court-strip-searches\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Supreme Court’s Strange Ruling On Strip Searches"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/","name":"Prose Before Hos","description":"The Far Side Of Politics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/#\/schema\/person\/1e19d7cf2b1a9aea1805fd7b4b4b2b4e","name":"Article of the Day","sameAs":["https:\/\/twitter.com\/pbhnetwork"],"url":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/author\/article-of-the-day\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130778"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/49"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=130778"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":133601,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/130778\/revisions\/133601"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=130778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=130778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=130778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}