The Text:<\/strong> A new study published in the journal Public Understanding of Science (PDF available here) surveyed a nationally representative sample of over 1,000 Americans in 2008 and 2011 about their media consumption and beliefs about climate change.<\/p>\nThe results suggest that conservative media consumption (specifically Fox News and Rush Limbaugh) decreases viewer trust in scientists, which in turn decreases belief that global warming is happening. In contrast, consumption of non-conservative media (specifically ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, The New York Times, and The Washington Post) increases consumer trust in scientists, and in turn belief that global warming is happening.<\/p>\n
The study also examined previous research on this issue and concluded that the conservative media creates distrust in scientists through five main methods:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
1) Presenting contrarian scientists as “objective” experts while presenting mainstream scientists as self-interested or biased.<\/p>\n
2) Denigrating scientific institutions and peer-reviewed journals.<\/p>\n
3) Equating peer-reviewed research with a politically liberal opinion.<\/p>\n
4) Accusing climate scientists of manipulating data to fund research projects.<\/p>\n
5) Characterizing climate science as a religion.<\/p>\n
Media Matters provides examples of Fox News engaging in all five of these tactics. One prime example involves contrarian meteorologist Joe Bastardi, a frequent climate misinformation guest on Fox News who Rolling Stone awarded the #1 dumbest thing ever said about global warming for claiming that CO2 “literally” cannot cause warming because it doesn’t “mix well in the atmosphere.”<\/p>\n
In reality we’ve known for nearly 190 years that rising CO2 causes global warming, and we know for certain it’s well-mixed throughout the atmosphere, as illustrated by measurements from around the world.<\/p>\n
The results of this study can be compared to the PhD research done by my Skeptical Science colleague John Cook, at the University of Queensland. Cook surveyed representative samples of Australians and Americans regarding their political ideologies and the effect of consensus on their acceptance of human-caused global warming. After being shown evidence of the consensus on human-caused global warming, Australian acceptance of this scientific reality grew across the political spectrum, but especially among conservatives.<\/p>\n
In the American sample, acceptance grew for most political groups, but especially among political liberals. In the American sample, there was also a small and extremely politically conservative group who actually became more likely to reject human-caused global warming in response to evidence of the expert consensus. Cook presented his data at the American Geophysical Union Chapman Conference on Climate Science Communication, shown in the video below at the 10-minute mark.<\/p>\n
![\"FOX](\"http:\/\/www.prosebeforehos.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/fox-news-climate-change.jpg\")
<\/p>\n