The disastrous rollout of the Obamacare Web site signals that the whole program could fail.<\/strong><\/p>\nThat is true. Although notice the tweaks I\u2019ve made to the argument some conservatives are advancing: it doesn\u2019t show that Obamacare will fail, no more than the opening few games of the Yankees\u2019 next season will show that they won\u2019t make it to the World Series. But it does raise the possibility that things will not work out.<\/p>\n
The government folk involved in Obamacare have not been honest\u2014either with themselves or with others\u2014about the shortcomings in what they were doing. There were plenty of missed deadlines to suggest that there was a train wreck coming. In fact, these officials were on full notice as recently as June\u2014in that same G.A.O. report I mention above\u2014that they could be in trouble in terms of meeting the goal of opening the Web site on October 1. The report said:<\/p>\n
Much remains to be accomplished within a relatively short amount of time. CMS\u2019s timelines and targeted completion dates provide a roadmap to completion\u2026. However, certain factors, such as the still-unknown and evolving scope of the exchange activities CMS will be required to perform in each state, and the large numbers of activities remaining to be performed\u2014some close to the start of enrollment\u2014suggest a potential for implementation challenges going forward. And while the missed interim deadlines may not affect implementation, additional missed deadlines closer to the start of enrollment could do so. CMS recently completed risk assessments and plans for mitigating identified risks associated with the data hub, and is also working on strategies to address state preparedness contingencies. Whether CMS\u2019s contingency planning will assure the timely and smooth implementation of the exchanges by October 2013 cannot yet be determined.<\/p>\n
Faced with that hurdle, which was described in achingly specific detail in the G.A.O. report, Obamacare officials bubbled confidently that there would not be a problem. The report quotes them as saying:<\/p>\n
In commenting on a draft of this report, the Department of Health and Human Services emphasized the progress it has made in establishing exchanges, and expressed its confidence that exchanges will be open and functioning in every state by October 1, 2013.<\/p>\n
Oops. That didn\u2019t work out as expected.<\/p>\n
And there is the problem: if the people running this thing were not honest or capable enough to see the disaster that was coming, how can anyone trust that their predictions of solving the problems fast enough to allow Americans to obtain insurance before the March 1st deadline is true?<\/p>\n
On top of that, let\u2019s look at the contracting work that was done by the administration. The I.T. contractor that was responsible for much of the healthcare.gov site was a Canadian company called CGI Federal, a subsidiary of CGI Group. http:\/\/www.cgi.com\/en The company was not a long-time player in the world of I.T. contracting for the American government. And its work in the health-care world has not been without struggles. A recent report in the Washington Examiner noted:<\/p>\n
CGI Federal\u2019s parent company, Montreal-based CGI Group, was officially terminated in September 2012 by an Ontario government health agency after the firm missed three years of deadlines and failed to deliver the province\u2019s flagship online medical registry. . . . eHealth, the Ontario provincial agency, scrapped its high-profile online medical registry for diabetes sufferers and treatment providers, and cancelled CGI Group\u2019s $46.2 million contract, on Sept. 5, 2012. The company was 14 months behind schedule when it was given notice of termination by the Ontario government agency. In the meantime, a group of other Ontario IT companies successfully replicated the registry, rendering CGI\u2019s project obsolete. Because the contract terms stipulated payment only upon delivery of a satisfactory final product, the province has refused to pay CGI . CGI has not publicly discussed the eHealth failure, but has taken legal action, including filing a defamation suit against eHealth and the Toronto Star newspaper.<\/p>\n
While that single event is not definitive, it certainly should have raised questions for Obama-administration officials about whether CGI\u2014particularly given its comparatively recent appearance on the American-government-contracting scene\u2014was the right company to entrust with such a complex and important project. And the fact that the company decided to bring even more attention to the negative news by suing the highest-circulation newspaper in Canada\u2014regardless of what it said\u2014says something about its strategic wisdom and temperament. That was guaranteed to bring even more attention to the story than just letting a news report slide.<\/p>\n
So, all those problems add up to one thing: Are the administration officials who are responsible for Obamacare up to the task? Can they honestly assess their own performance and shortcomings, and are they exercising the care to make the right decisions up front?<\/p>\n
Not sure. But these facts don\u2019t bode well for their skill set here. And it is that reason\u2014not whether or not the Web site worked on day one\u2014that should give the honest assessor of Obamacare pause. These folks might not be up to this incredibly complicated task.<\/p>\n
So, does all of this mean we should pull the plug on Obamacare? Of course not. Does it mean we shouldn\u2019t worry, since Web sites have bugs? No again.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, there is only one correct answer: we have to wait. If Obamacare works, it works. If it doesn\u2019t, it doesn\u2019t. No amount of prognosticating now is worth the time it takes to utter the words.<\/p>\n
One thing, though, that I fully believe in: democracy. If Obamacare is a disaster, I have little doubt that the G.O.P. will be voted into office and be able to unwind the whole system\u2014the proper, Constitutional way to handle a program opposed by one party, rather than engaging in the extortion approach they exercised recently. And if Obamacare works, I have no doubt that the Democrats will be able to see the benefits at the voting booth for a long time to come.<\/p>\n
And face facts: it is that reality\u2014long-term political survival\u2014that is the real basis for the partisan attacks and defenses of the botched opening days of Obamacare.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Article: The Agnostic\u2019s Guide to the Botched Obamacare Rollout by Kurt Eichenwald in Vanity Fair. The Text: There isn\u2019t a lot of honesty when it comes to discussing Obamacare. Too many Republicans lie about the implications of the health-insurance program and dismiss out of hand the reasons a massive overhaul of the long-time system […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[259],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
The Agnostic's Guide To The Botched Obamacare Rollout<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n