The Text:<\/strong><\/p>\nREPORTS have surfaced in the press about a meeting that occurred last Saturday in Salt Lake City involving more than 50 pro-family leaders. The purpose of the gathering was to discuss our response if both the Democratic and Republican Parties nominate standard-bearers who are supportive of abortion. Although I was neither the convener nor the moderator of the meeting, I\u2019d like to offer several brief clarifications about its outcome and implications.<\/p>\n
After two hours of deliberation, we voted on a resolution that can be summarized as follows: If neither of the two major political parties nominates an individual who pledges himself or herself to the sanctity of human life, we will join others in voting for a minor-party candidate. Those agreeing with the proposition were invited to stand. The result was almost unanimous.<\/p>\n
The other issue discussed at length concerned the advisability of creating a third party if Democrats and Republicans do indeed abandon the sanctity of human life and other traditional family values. Though there was some support for the proposal, no consensus emerged.<\/p>\n
Speaking personally, and not for the organization I represent or the other leaders gathered in Salt Lake City, I firmly believe that the selection of a president should begin with a recommitment to traditional moral values and beliefs. Those include the sanctity of human life, the institution of marriage, and other inviolable pro-family principles. Only after that determination is made can the acceptability of a nominee be assessed.<\/p>\n
The other approach, which I find problematic, is to choose a candidate according to the likelihood of electoral success or failure. Polls don\u2019t measure right and wrong; voting according to the possibility of winning or losing can lead directly to the compromise of one\u2019s principles. In the present political climate, it could result in the abandonment of cherished beliefs that conservative Christians have promoted and defended for decades. Winning the presidential election is vitally important, but not at the expense of what we hold most dear.<\/p>\n
One other clarification is germane, even though unrelated to the meeting in Salt Lake City. The secular news media has been reporting in recent months that the conservative Christian movement is hopelessly fractured and internally antagonistic. The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday, for example, that supporters of traditional family values are rapidly \u201csplintering.\u201d That is not true. The near unanimity in Salt Lake City is evidence of much greater harmony than supposed. Admittedly, differences of opinion exist among us about our choices for president.<\/p>\n
That divergence is entirely reasonable, now just over a year before the national election. It is hardly indicative of a \u201csplintering\u201d of old alliances. If the major political parties decide to abandon conservative principles, the cohesion of pro-family advocates will be all too apparent in 2008.<\/p>\n
<\/nyt_author_id><\/p>\nJames C. Dobson, founder and chairman of the evangelical organization Focus on the Family Action, is the author of \u201cBringing Up Boys: Practical Advice and Encouragement for Those Shaping the Next Generation of Men.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Is this the first blow to a unified Republican Party? Is a split coming down the line, and if it is, will the Democrats have a similar fracture? The Text: REPORTS have surfaced in the press about a meeting that occurred last Saturday in Salt Lake City involving more than 50 pro-family leaders. The purpose […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":49,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[259],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Has The Bell Tolled? - Prose Before Hos<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n