Senators Protect Big Oil, Receive Big Checks

The Article: Senators Who Voted To Protect Oil Tax Breaks Received $23,582,500 From Big Oil by Rebecca Leber in Think Progress.

The Text: In a 51-47 vote, 43 Senate Republicans and four Democrats filibustered to protect $24 billion in tax breaks for Big Oil. Although a majority voted for Sen. Robert Menendezā€™s (D-NJ) bill, it fell short of the 60 needed. The only two Republicans to break rank were Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and retiring Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME).

A Think Progress Green analysis shows how oil and gas companies have funneled cash to the same senators who protected its handouts:

ā€“ The 47 senators voting against the bill have received $23,582,500 in career contributions from oil and gas. The 51 senators voting to repeal oil tax breaks have received $5,873,600.

ā€“ The senators who voted for Big Oilā€™s handouts received on average over four times as much career oil cash as those who voted to end them.

Continue Reading

Email

Is It Time To Legalize The Use Of Hard Drugs?

The Article: Should the US legalize hard drugs? by George F. Will in The Washington Post.

The Text: Amelioration of todayā€™s drug problem requires Americans to understand the significance of the 80-20 ratio. Twenty percent of American drinkers consume 80 percent of the alcohol sold here. The same 80-20 split obtains among users of illicit drugs.

About 3 million people ā€” less than 1 percent of Americaā€™s population ā€” consume 80 percent of illegal hard drugs. Drug-trafficking organizations can be most efficiently injured by changing the behavior of the 20 percent of heavy users, and we are learning how to do so. Reducing consumption by the 80 percent of casual users will not substantially reduce the northward flow of drugs or the southward flow of money.

Consider current policy concerning the only addictive intoxicant currently available as a consumer good ā€” alcohol. Americaā€™s alcohol industry, which is as dependent on the 20 percent of heavy drinkers as they are on alcohol, markets its products aggressively and effectively. Because marketing can drive consumption, Americaā€™s distillers, brewers and vintners spend $6 billion on advertising and promoting their products. Americansā€™ experience with marketingā€™s power inclines them to favor prohibition and enforcement over legalization and marketing of drugs.

Continue Reading

Email

The Supreme Court’s Strange Ruling On Strip Searches

The Article: US Justices approve strip searches for any offense by Adam Liptak in The New York Times.

The Text: The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arrested for any offense, however minor, before admitting them to jails even if the officials have no reason to suspect the presence of contraband.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, joined by the courtā€™s conservative wing, wrote that courts are in no position to second-guess the judgments of correctional officials who must consider not only the possibility of smuggled weapons and drugs, but also public health and information about gang affiliations.

ā€œEvery detainee who will be admitted to the general population may be required to undergo a close visual inspection while undressed,ā€ Justice Kennedy wrote, adding that about 13 million people are admitted each year to the nationā€™s jails.

Continue Reading

Email

It’s Time To End The Drug War

The Article: Let’s Be Blunt: It’s Time to End the Drug War by Art Carden in Forbes.

The Text: April 20 is the counter-culture ā€œholidayā€ on which lots and lots of people come together to advocate marijuana legalization (or just get high). Should drugsā€”especially marijuanaā€”be legal? The answer is ā€œyes.ā€ Immediately. Without hesitation. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200 seized in a civil asset forfeiture. The war on drugs has been a dismal failure. Itā€™s high time to end prohibition. Even if you arenā€™t willing to go whole-hog and legalize all drugs, at the very least we should legalize marijuana.

For the sake of the argument, letā€™s go ahead and assume that everything youā€™ve heard about the dangers of drugs is completely true. That probably means that using drugs is a terrible idea. It doesnā€™t mean, however, that the drug war is a good idea.

Prohibition is a textbook example of a policy with negative unintended consequences. Literally: itā€™s an example in the textbook I use in my introductory economics classes (Cowen and Tabarrok, Modern Principles of Economics if youā€™re curious) and in the most popular introductory economics textbook in the world (by N. Gregory Mankiw).The demand curve for drugs is extremely inelastic, meaning that people donā€™t change their drug consumption very much in response to changes in prices. Therefore, vigorous enforcement means higher prices and higher revenues for drug dealers. In fact, Iā€™ll defer to Cowen and Tabarrokā€”page 60 of the first edition, if youā€™re still curiousā€”for a discussion of the basic economic logic:

Continue Reading

Email

What The Dying Regret Most

The Article: Top five regrets of the dying by Susie Steiner in The Guardian.

The Text: There was no mention of more sex or bungee jumps. A palliative nurse who has counselled the dying in their last days has revealed the most common regrets we have at the end of our lives. And among the top, from men in particular, is ‘I wish I hadn’t worked so hard’.

Bronnie Ware is an Australian nurse who spent several years working in palliative care, caring for patients in the last 12 weeks of their lives. She recorded their dying epiphanies in a blog called Inspiration and Chai, which gathered so much attention that she put her observations into a book called The Top Five Regrets of the Dying.

Ware writes of the phenomenal clarity of vision that people gain at the end of their lives, and how we might learn from their wisdom. “When questioned about any regrets they had or anything they would do differently,” she says, “common themes surfaced again and again.”

Continue Reading

Email

Hot On The Web